Pitchers duo fail to extinguish liability claim

Liability claim dogging Pitchers' pair

Pitcher Partners WA chief Bryan Hughes.

Over in the West this week, Pitcher Partners’ Bryan Hughes and Daniel Bredenkamp failed in their latest attempt to extinguish liability claims being pursued by US energy outfit Blue Sky Offshore Services.

The Pitchers pair had applied to the Supreme Court of West Australia for summary judgment against Blue Sky on the basis that its claims against them were not arguable and had no realistic chance of success.

Blue Sky is claiming that Hughes and Bredenkamp allegedly breached the terms of an exclusivity agreement in their capacity as deed administrators of Hydra Energy WA whilst the Pitchers pair are of the opinion that they have no liability under the agreement and therefore no case to answer.

Supreme Court of West Australia’s Craig Sanderson however wasn’t convinced that the deed administrators had shown Blue Sky’s arguments to be invalid.

“It seems to me the position is arguable,” Master Sanderson said in Blue Sky Offshore Services Pte Ltd V Bredenkamp & Hughes [2017] WASC 213 (3 August 2017).

“Once again I could not reach the conclusion that the plaintiff’s argument on this point is so hopeless as to warrant striking out the action. Once that point is reached the application for summary judgment must fail,” Sanderson said.

The American energy group has been chasing the Pitchers Pair since earlier this year after they allegedly breached an exclusivity arrangement put in place while Blue Sky investigated the possibility of purchasing Hydra Energy WA’s suite of hydrocarbon assets located in West Australia’s Carnavon Basin.

Liability claim dogging Pitchers' pair

Pitcher Partners’ Daniel Bredenkamp.

Hughes and Bredenkamp were appointed voluntary administrators of Hydra Energy WA in March 2016. In April of that year the DoCA was put in place. In November 2016 Blue Sky handed over $50,000 in exchange for a 15-day exclusivity window during which it conducted due diligence on the Hydra assets with a view to an acquisition.

The exclusivity period was extended three times and on December 20 Blue Sky made an offer. However Blue Sky claims that during the exclusivity period Hydra WA’s director Paul Nimmo procured a rival bid from Hydra Energy WA’s parent company, Hydra Energy Holdings (HEH), in breach of the agreement.

Ultimately the rival bid was accepted by the deed administrators, leaving Blue Sky short $50k. No doubt it’s wanting its money back plus some quantum of perceived loss, plus interest and costs of course.

The liability claim continues, as it does in relation to another DoCA Hughes and Bredenkamp are handling that has seen a creditor go after them for allegedly demonstrating a lack of independence. They’re defending those allegations too.

Further reading:

Pitchers Pair Clinging To Disputed DoCA

About the Author

Peter Gosnell

Sydney Insolvency News illuminates the practice of insolvency in Australia’s largest city, highlighting the triumphs and failures of Sydney’s registered practitioners and the accounting and legal professionals who work with them. SiN is produced by Peter Gosnell, former business editor and senior business reporter at The Daily Telegraph newspaper. During a decade-long career, your correspondent reported on such notable corporate collapses as HIH, One.Tel, Westpoint and Fincorp as well as some of the nation’s highest profile bankruptcies and the investigations and prosecutions arising from Australia’s most notorious instances of white collar crime.

Be the first to comment on "Pitchers duo fail to extinguish liability claim"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*